Product Details
Book S.O. Annual/biannual/biennial
Annual volumes supplied on standing order subscription
Approximately 550 pages
1 volume bound

Can We Help?

If you need assistance, please call us at (416) 609-3800 (Toronto & international) / 1-800-387-5164 (toll free Canada & US).

We will be glad to assist you.

Defending Drinking and Driving Cases 2017
Availability: In Stock

A practical guidebook to assist defence counsel in defending a client charged with drinking and driving.

This practical guidebook, by renowned criminal defence lawyer Alan D. Gold, assists defence counsel in defending a client charged with a drinking and driving offence in a logical and coherent fashion from the beginning to the end of the process. It provides sound, practical advice on all steps along the way, including how to handle a phone call from the police station, factual issues to note, novel defences, the relevant law and sentencing. Topics addressed include the validity of the approved screening device test, proof of impairment, admissibility of blood and breathalyzer tests results, Charter defences, the concept of "care and control," and sentencing. The technical aspects of demands, breathalyzer reports, certificates, blood alcohol content reports and alcohol influence reports are also covered.


New in this Edition


This 2017 edition has been updated to reflect all the legislative developments since the last edition and incorporates all significant developments in the case law, including:


  • R. v. DeCastro (Ont. S.C.J.) – after the Crown failed to prove the first breath test had been taken within two hours, the trial judge erred by relying on assumptions of how fast police would have responded to the accident.
  • R. v. Schouten (Ont. C.A.) – the odour of alcohol on the driver’s breath, accompanied by an admission of consumption hours earlier, made for reasonable grounds to believe alcohol remained in the body of the driver.
  • R. v. Suter (S.C.C.) – although impairment was not established at trial, and even though the fatal accident was caused by non-impaired driver error, the trial judge’s application of the sentencing range for  impaired driving causing death was not an error.
  • R. v. Vallentgoed (Alta. C.A.) – historical maintenance records of the impugned breathalyzer device were held not to be fruits of the investigation and not subject to obligatory disclosure, which meant the defence bears the onus of establishing their likely relevance.
About the Author

Alan D. Gold practices at Gold Professional Corporation, 20 Adelaide Street East, Suite 210, Toronto, M5C 2T6. His practice is restricted to criminal trial and appellate work, but otherwise covers the spectrum from sex offenses to white-collar crime, drinking and driving offences to homicides, including search and seizure issues and other Charter litigation. He has appeared as counsel before all levels of courts in Ontario, as well as in seven of the other provinces. A large number of the cases Mr. Gold has argued before the Ontario Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of Canada are reported. Mr. Gold is certified by the Law Society of Upper Canada as a Specialist in Criminal Litigation and was the first Chairman of the Criminal Litigation Specialty Committee for five years. In 1993 in Washington D.C. Mr. Gold was inducted into the American College of Trial Lawyers. He was honoured in 1997 with the annual G. Arthur Martin Award for Contribution to Criminal Justice, awarded November 22nd, 1997, in Toronto. He is a past President of the Ontario Criminal Lawyers Association from 1997 to 2001. Mr. Gold was elected as a Bencher of the Law Society of Upper Canada in May 2003 for a four year term.  He is also the author of Defending Drinking and Driving Cases and Drinking & Driving Law, both published by Thomson Reuters.