Product Details
Book S.O. Annual/biannual/biennial
Annual editions supplied on standing order subscription
Approximately 800 pages
1 volume bound

Can We Help?

If you need assistance, please call us at (416) 609-3800 (Toronto & international) / 1-800-387-5164 (toll free Canada & US).

We will be glad to assist you.

Handling Provincial Offence Cases in Ontario 2018
Availability: Temporarily out of stock

A new edition of this product will be released within the next 60 days.

To order the new edition, please contact Carswell Customer Relations at 416-609-3800 (Toronto
& International Customers) / 1-800-387-5164 (Canadian & US Customers).

Handling Provincial Offence Cases in Ontario 2018 provides systematic guidance for defending and prosecuting provincial offence cases in Ontario.

Handling Provincial Offence Cases in Ontario 2018 provides systematic guidance for defending and prosecuting provincial offence cases in Ontario, ranging from driving offences to complex occupational health and safety violations and environmental protection infractions. Separate chapters cover mens rea offences, strict liability offences, and absolute liability offences including the scope of liability and corporate responsibility. 

New in this edition

Legislation update:

  • The Stronger, Fairer Ontario Act (Budget Measures) 2017 (Bill 177) was given Royal Assent on 14 December 2017. This legislation, S.O. 2017, c.34, contains Schedule 35, which makes numerous substantive changes to the Provincial Offences Act. One of the changes is an amendment to the definition of “prosecutor” in s.1(1), which includes persons acting on behalf of a municipality under a transfer agreement.

Case law updates:

  • York (Regional Municipality) v. Tomovski, 2018 ONCA 57 [(In Chambers)] – Leave to appeal was refused where the “decision” of the provincial court appeal judge was that the stay of proceedings should be set aside because there was no breach of s.11(b) of the Charter of Rights. The Municipality’s proposed appeal sought an advisory opinion of the Court of Appeal that was detached from the underlying facts.
  • R. v. Cvokic, 2017 ONCJ 517 – As per s.21(1) of the Provincial Offences Act, the exception to obtain the Attorney General’s consent to prosecute is triggered when the Part I or II certificates have been filed. In the defendant’s case, the Part I certificate was not filed so there was no required Attorney General consent. In the result, the defendant’s Part III charge was valid.
  • R. v. Boukaras, 2017 ONCJ 608 – The justice of the peace committed reversible legal error in dismissing the charge because the officer had no independent recollection of the events that brought the defendant to court. The officer’s notes were properly admitted into evidence as record of his past recollection of the incident that brought the defendant to court.
  • Oshawa (City) v. 536813 Ontario Ltd., 2017 ONCJ 836 – The trial Justice erred in ordering costs against the “Prosecution”, the “City of Oshawa” and the “Prosecutor, the City of Oshawa” because the evidentiary record did not support a finding that the conduct of the prosecutors constituted “a marked and unacceptable departure from the reasonable standards expected of the prosecution” or that the prosecution was directed by the municipality for self-interest and financial gain.
  • Ontario (Ministry of Labour) v. Belle-Pak Packaging Inc., 2017 ONCJ 811 – With s.11(b) of the Charter applying to both regulatory and Criminal Code offences, the net delay in the instant case was just under 26 months, which was well over the 18-month ceiling for provincial courts that applies to provincial offences court proceedings. The delay resulted from the Crown’s inaccurate assessment of time required for the case denying the defendant of the constitutional right to have a trial in a timely fashion.
About the Author

John Pearson Allen, Ph.D., has a general practice, with a focus on business law and estate planning. After being admitted to the Bar in 1991, John clerked with the Ontario Superior Court, joining Allen & Allen in 1992.

John has a Bachelor of Arts, a Bachelor of Science, a Bachelor of Laws, and—while working full-time at Allen & Allen—obtained his Masters and PhD in securities law from Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto. John has been counsel for and a director of a number of private and public companies, including a real estate investment company and an energy resource company both listed on the TSX Venture Exchange.

In addition to his practice of law, John is co-author of the annual Handling Provincial Offence Cases in Ontario with Justice Libman of the Ontario Court of Justice; he is co-editor of RegQuest, a monthly update on regulatory offences and compliance in Canada with Justice Libman and Professor Aron; and he has written articles for the Canadian Business Law Journal, the Advocates Journal and the Criminal Law Quarterly. John has been a Certified Financial Planner (CFP) and has taught contracts and evidence law at Humber College for the Bachelor of Arts program for paralegals and business law at Ryerson University in Toronto.

Mr. Justice Rick Libman, Ph.D., was appointed to the Ontario Court of Justice in November, 1996. He is Chair of the Rule Committee of the Ontario Court of Justice. Justice Libman is the Associate Editor of Motor Vehicle Reports and co-author of Annotated Ontario Provincial Offences Act, Handling Provincial Offence Cases in Ontario, the Annotated Contraventions Act and the regulatory offences newsletter RegQuest.